What We Believe: The Beauty of the Catholic Faith Video Trailer
One and a half minute trailer for the new video study series from Ascension Pres...
This post is also available in: Spanish, Italian
The story of Doubting Thomas shows us that even apostles live, not by justice, but by Divine Mercy. That’s why this story is always the subject of the gospel on Divine Mercy Sunday, the Octave of Easter.
The Gospels tell an incredible story. A virginal conception. Miraculous healings. Even people coming back from the dead. How are we to know that it’s not all just a fanciful fabrication?
There is much evidence for the reliability of the Gospels, but here is one of the strongest bits of evidence I know. Think for a minute. If you were part of a group who decided to perpetrate an elaborate hoax, what would be your motive? Wouldn’t you want to gain some significant benefits from such a risky business? Maybe fortune, fame, and privilege? And if you were to be prominent figures in this tall tale, wouldn’t you at least want the story to make you look good?
But in the story told by the apostles, virtually all of them look real bad. During Jesus public ministry they repeatedly fail to “get it.” In fact Jesus wears himself out trying to hammer the truth through their thick skulls. After witnessing three years of miracles, one of them betrays Jesus and the leader of the group denies him. All but one run away when he’s crucified, and no one believes Mary Magdalene when she brings them the news of his resurrection.
But the episode recounted in John 20:19-31 takes the cake. The Risen Christ appears to the twelve on Easter Sunday evening. Or rather, I should say he appeared to the ten. Judas, the traitor, had taken his own life. And Thomas, the twin, missed the occasion. When Thomas returns to the group, he refuses to believe them. He demands empirical proof submitted personally to his lordship: “Unless I put my finger in the nail marks in his hands and place my hand in his side,I will not believe.” This sounds more like a pouting of a child than the words of an apostle.
In justice, Jesus could have just said “enough.” Thomas had already seen so much. Acts 1 tells us that Judas was replaced by Matthias. This ungrateful skeptic could easily have been replaced as well.
But Jesus does not deal with us by virtue of strict justice. God forbid! No, he comes to us in mercy, giving us what we do not deserve. And that’s how he dealt with this doubter. A week later, he gives him what he asked for. Imagine how badly Thomas yearned to eat his words as he put his hand into the sacred side of the New Adam.
Thomas can’t be said to come to true “faith” in the resurrection through all this. Because faith is about believing what you can’t see. Walking by faith means NOT walking by sight. In heaven, we’ll see God face to face, so “faith” will be no more. Blessed, says Jesus, are those who have not seen, and yet believe.
But Thomas does come to faith in something else that he can’t quite see. He saw Lazarus, the son of the widow of Nain plus the daughter of Jairus, all raised from the dead.
Thomas now looks at yet another risen human being before him and says what he did not say to the prior three: “My Lord and My God.” Thomas here professes what can only be seen by the eye of faith. The resurrection of Jesus is not just a marvel for Ripley’s Believe it or Not. Jesus is not just some first century Houdini. No, his resurrection is a sign that he is the Messiah, the King, even the Eternal God, come in the flesh.
So this man, humbled by Christ’s mercy, is content to be known for all generations as “Doubting Thomas.” Thomas the Doubter and the other apostles spread a story in which they look real bad. And for it they receive not privilege but persecution and death.
So why do they spread the story?
Because it’s the truth. And because it’s a proclamation of the Divine Mercy of God who does not reject the thick-headed, the weak, and the doubting but instead gives them the power to become strong, loving, and wise. “Behold,” says Jesus, “I make all things new.” (Rev 21:5)
For more resources for the Easter Season and Divine Mercy Sunday, see the EASTER section of the Crossroads Initiative Library.
This post on Doubting Thomas is offered as a reflection on Acts 2: 42-47; Psalm 118:2-24; I Peter 1:3-9; John 20:19-31, the Mass readings for the Octave of Easter (Divine Mercy Sunday), year A.
Banner/featured image Doubting Saint Thomas by Martin Schongauer in the 15th century. CC 2.0.
Towards InfinityPosted at 17:18h, 30 January
The Apostle Thomas did not stick his hand into the side of Jesus. How can you get this by reading the text? Can you reference other early church fathers who claim this? To me the text does not suggest this at all. I found that Cyril of Alexendria and Origen suggest it, but they do not make a strong argument. You would think that if this really happened, it would have been more strongly discussed.
For this cause our Lord Jesus Christ, greatly to our profit, laid bare His Side to Thomas, and exposed the wounds on His Person, through his agency giving adequate proof to all. For though of Thomas alone is recorded the saying: Except I shall put my hands and see the prints, of the nails, and put my hand into His Side, I will not believe, yet was the charge of lack of faith common to them all; and we shall find that the minds of the other disciples were not free from perplexity, though they said unto the holy Thomas: We have seen the Lord.”
It was meet, however, for Thomas to touch Him, as he, as well as the rest, had been enriched with the Spirit. For, as we said before, he was not on account of his absence without his share in the Spirit. For the munificence of the Giver reached unto him also, when the boon was granted to the entire company of the holy disciples. Commentary On The Gospel According To Saint John Volumes 1&2 Book 12 CHAPTER I S. CYRIL ARCHBISHOP OF ALEXANDRIA VOL 2: LONDON: WALTER SMITH (LATE MOZLEY), 34, KING STREET, COVENT GARDEN. 1885 https://www.ecatholic2000.com/cyril2/untitled-81.shtml
“For the one thing that most people think they know about Doubting Thomas, namely that he stuck his finger into Jesus’ wounds, turns out upon inspection not only to receive no support at all from the source of this story, the Gospel of John, but indeed to be contradicted by it.”
Most, Glenn W., and Glenn W MOST. Doubting Thomas, Harvard University Press, 2005. ProQuest Ebook Central, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/liberty/detail.action?docID=3300002.